War Memorial

Queensland’s Kenilworth war memorial seems unremarkable to the average passerby. If you blink, you’ll miss it, and even if you don’t blink, you might still miss it. But a keener observer would notice that there are four services represented. Along with the navy, army and air force, the memorial honours the merchant navy, acknowledging the role commercial sailors have played in Australia’s national defence. It isn’t a military service, but in times of crisis—natural disasters, regional unrest and wars—the merchant navy has delivered food, fuel, medical equipment and arms to military efforts and kept the economy going at home. Merchant vessels have run raw materials to steel mills, fuel to distribution points, and other cargo around the country, often as defenceless targets. Referring to the Second World War, Winston Churchill  said of those wearing a merchant navy lapel badge: ‘If you ever meet one of those men, take your hat off to him because we would have lost the war if it was not for them.’

UK’s Bipartisan Commitment for Merchant Navy

It’s no surprise, then, that the UK has made a largely bipartisan commitment since to maintain a strong merchant navy. It proved invaluable in the Falklands War, which couldn’t have been prosecuted without a requisitioned fleet of more than 40 merchant ships. One of them, the Atlantic Conveyor, was sunk by an Argentine missile, killing 12 personnel .Rather than list the OECD countries that have maintained a merchant navy capacity, it’s simpler to name the countries that haven’t: Australia and New Zealand.

Australia’s Ranking in Shipping vs Landlocked Countries

So, where does Australia rank as a shipping nation? We barely earn a mention in world shipping rankings. Even landlocked Switzerland outranks us, and the largest shipping country by tonnage globally is China. This leaves Australia too dependent on foreign interests to move our international, and even domestic, cargo over sea.

China Dominates Shipping

Unsurprisingly, China performs the largest component of our sea trade, despite being unquestionably our biggest potential adversary. What would Australians think if, when they wished to fly from Sydney to Melbourne, their choices were overwhelmingly flights with China Airlines, alongside a smattering of Air India, Indonesia’s Garuda or Russia’s Aeroflot?

Bushfires & Merchant Navy Role

During the Mallacoota bushfires in January 2020, geographical luck meant that one of the few remaining Australian-crewed merchant vessels was in the area supporting the Bass Strait oil fields. It made it to Mallacoota 24 hours before the navy and provided fuel, water, supplies and, critically, a last-resort method for evacuation if needed.

Merchant Navy Support in War

During World War II, 30 Australian merchant vessels were sunk running supplies around our coast. We had the capacity to endure that then. During the 1999–2000 Australia-led operations in East Timor, two Australian-crewed merchant vessels were chartered to run supplies to Dili for some months. But that local supplier no longer exists.

Merchant Navy – National Sovereignty and Maritime Development & Training

A merchant fleet also provides a maritime training ground that Australia sorely badly needs. As an island nation dependent on sea trade, Australia needs skilled sailors, harbour masters, marine pilots, tug masters and engineers, safety regulators, port operations managers and technical managers and marine managers for exports. Without a strong merchant navy, we put ourselves on the path to importing these skills. It’s unacceptable that those who manage our ports, who pilot ships into and out of port, and who manage our maritime safety could be non-Australians. Costs and industrial relations issues are cited as the reason for the hollowing out of the Australian merchant navy, but that doesn’t stop the French and other countries with frequently contested industrial frameworks from achieving ample commercial maritime resilience. The truth is we haven’t bothered, because we’ve been busy enjoying the longest period of uninterrupted economic growth the world has ever recorded. In pursuit of this growth, we accepted offers from the lowest bidder and decimated the fourth emblem on the memorial wall at Kenilworth.

India’s Attempt at expanding its Merchant Navy

India’s ambitions to launch a new shipping company on a public-private partnership model to be jointly owned by state-run oil and  gas, and fertiliser industries based on long-term 15-year contracts is facing derision from its shipping and industrial community which advocates diversion of the planned huge capital investment to The Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) . This new shipping expansion venture operation’s financing would likely be arranged from a $ 3.6 billion government development fund. India imports almost 220-250 million tons of crude oil, 25 million tons of coal and 7 million tons of fertiliser and shipping costs on these imports are estimated to be in the range of $ 75 to $ 80 billion payable in foreign currency (93 % exports & 40% of Indian cargoes are transported on foreign ships) . At present most of the cargo is transported on foreign-owned ships as the growth of India’s fleet has not been at par with its increasing trade volumes. India’s present fleet comprises of over 1,500 ships mostly old and small.

The Shipping Corporation of India would be mandated to manage the ships and invest in the new fleet. The plan envisions expanding the existing fleet to 1,000 ships in the coming decade as it is anticipated that shipping costs payable in foreign currency would escalate to $ 400 billion as India industrializes. This would entail a huge capital infusion.Recently India began implementing regulations to prevent the acquisition and registration of older ships to modernize its fleet. However, SCI is confronted with challenges being a state-owned and bureaucratic entity which is impeding the governments divestment  goals . In the shipping business the commodity seller typically arranges transportation at the buyer’s expense and ships need to carry cargo in both directions to be economical giving rise to the issue as to how the Indian fleet would manage to arrange export cargoes for return trips. Pakistan’s national flag carrier , the Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (PNSC) , ships have dwindled from around 66 in the year 1971 to 11 ships as of today ( out of which only 7 are fully operational) and some are run on charter basis with 4 tankers carrying captive crude and refined petroleum products cargoes .

Financial Incentives for Merchant Navy Expansion

If the federal government is truly seeking to build national resilience, it needs to overcome the barriers to rebuilding a merchant navy. It can start with the seafarer tax and maritime corporate taxes, which should be aligned with those of comparable countries in the OECD. Also, ships registered on the Australian international shipping register should be allowed trade on the Australian coast 12 months a year, and all government contracts for commercial shipping should be reviewed to ensure that they include provisions for Australian content and the training of Australian deck and engineering officers. Finally, it’s time the government made good on its election promise of delivering a strategic fleet of 12 vessels with commercial partners for this exact purpose. These measures taken together may not fix the problem alone, but they will breathe life into an Australian merchant navy that will be strategically critical for decades to come.

By Nadir Mumtaz

Credit / Source

Credit for this enlightening article is attributed to Peter Court an internationally experienced master mariner, principal consultant at DNV Consulting and founder of Court Marine consulting. Image:  Brian Row via Australian War Memorial.

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australian-navy-army-air-force-whats-missing-a-strong-merchant-navy/

https://www.focuseatv.com/indias-plan-for-new-state-backed-shipping-company-faces-skepticism